Ranking
Loading ranking…
Loading ranking…
2011: Himachal Pradesh ranks first at 52.0%. 35 entries; unit: percent.
| Rank | Entry | Relative value | Value (percent) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Himachal Pradesh | 52.0% | |
| 2 | Daman and Diu | 50.0% | |
| 3 | Sikkim | 50.0% | |
| 4 | Nagaland | 49.0% | |
| 5 | Chhattisgarh | 48.0% | |
| 6 | Andhra Pradesh | 47.0% | |
| 7 | Dadra and Nagar Haveli | 46.0% | |
| 8 | Karnataka | 46.0% | |
| 9 | Manipur | 46.0% | |
| 10 | Tamil Nadu | 46.0% | |
| 11 | Maharashtra | 44.0% | |
| 12 | Mizoram | 44.0% | |
| 13 | Rajasthan | 44.0% | |
| 14 | Madhya Pradesh | 43.0% | |
| 15 | Arunachal Pradesh | 42.0% | |
| 16 | Odisha | 42.0% | |
| 17 | Gujarat | 41.0% | |
| 18 | Andaman and Nicobar Islands | 40.0% | |
| 19 | Goa | 40.0% | |
| 20 | Jharkhand | 40.0% | |
| 21 | Meghalaya | 40.0% | |
| 22 | Tripura | 40.0% | |
| 23 | Assam | 38.0% | |
| 24 | Chandigarh | 38.0% | |
| 25 | Uttarakhand | 38.0% | |
| 26 | West Bengal | 38.0% | |
| 27 | Puducherry | 36.0% | |
| 28 | Punjab | 36.0% | |
| 29 | Haryana | 35.0% | |
| 30 | Kerala | 35.0% | |
| 31 | Jammu and Kashmir | 34.0% | |
| 32 | Bihar | 33.0% | |
| 33 | NCT of Delhi | 33.0% | |
| 34 | Uttar Pradesh | 33.0% | |
| 35 | Lakshadweep | 29.0% |
Within India, Himachal Pradesh ranks first in 2011 with 52.0%, followed by Daman and Diu (50.0%) and Sikkim (50.0%).
Across 35 entries, values run from 52.0% (Himachal Pradesh) to 29.0% (Lakshadweep), with a median of 40.0%.
Source: Office of the Registrar General & Census Commissioner, India — Primary Census Abstract (PCA), 2011, State/District level, 2011. Unit: percent.
Source: Office of the Registrar General & Census Commissioner, India — Primary Census Abstract (PCA), 2011, State/District level · Government of India Census data; public statistical use · manually compiled Oct 22, 2026
Source notes: AllRanks assistant verified on 2026-10-22 against the linked official Census 2011 workbook, Sheet1. Read all 35 state/UT-level “Total” rows (excluded India aggregate, rural/urban subtotals, and district rows); matched the State/UT labels and source columns and re-sorted descending. Derived rates are calculated only from the workbook columns as described. The Census 2011 administrative boundaries are retained; later state/UT reorganizations are not retrofitted.
Coverage describes this list, not necessarily the full population. Missing entries do not imply a value of zero. Collection & methodology →