Ranking
Loading ranking…
Loading ranking…
2011: NCT of Delhi ranks first at 98.0%. 35 entries; unit: percent.
| Rank | Entry | Relative value | Value (percent) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | NCT of Delhi | 98.0% | |
| 2 | Chandigarh | 97.0% | |
| 3 | Lakshadweep | 78.0% | |
| 4 | Daman and Diu | 75.0% | |
| 5 | Puducherry | 68.0% | |
| 6 | Goa | 62.0% | |
| 7 | Mizoram | 52.0% | |
| 8 | Kerala | 48.0% | |
| 9 | Tamil Nadu | 48.0% | |
| 10 | Dadra and Nagar Haveli | 47.0% | |
| 11 | Maharashtra | 45.0% | |
| 12 | Gujarat | 43.0% | |
| 13 | Karnataka | 39.0% | |
| 14 | Andaman and Nicobar Islands | 38.0% | |
| 15 | Punjab | 37.0% | |
| 16 | Haryana | 35.0% | |
| 17 | Andhra Pradesh | 33.0% | |
| 18 | West Bengal | 32.0% | |
| 19 | Uttarakhand | 30.0% | |
| 20 | Manipur | 29.0% | |
| 21 | Nagaland | 29.0% | |
| 22 | Madhya Pradesh | 28.0% | |
| 23 | Jammu and Kashmir | 27.0% | |
| 24 | Tripura | 26.0% | |
| 25 | Rajasthan | 25.0% | |
| 26 | Sikkim | 25.0% | |
| 27 | Jharkhand | 24.0% | |
| 28 | Arunachal Pradesh | 23.0% | |
| 29 | Chhattisgarh | 23.0% | |
| 30 | Uttar Pradesh | 22.0% | |
| 31 | Meghalaya | 20.0% | |
| 32 | Odisha | 17.0% | |
| 33 | Assam | 14.0% | |
| 34 | Bihar | 11.0% | |
| 35 | Himachal Pradesh | 10.0% |
Within India, NCT of Delhi ranks first in 2011 with 98.0%, followed by Chandigarh (97.0%) and Lakshadweep (78.0%).
Across 35 entries, values run from 98.0% (NCT of Delhi) to 10.0% (Himachal Pradesh), with a median of 32.0%.
Source: Office of the Registrar General & Census Commissioner, India — Primary Census Abstract (PCA), 2011, State/District level, 2011. Unit: percent.
Source: Office of the Registrar General & Census Commissioner, India — Primary Census Abstract (PCA), 2011, State/District level · Government of India Census data; public statistical use · manually compiled Oct 22, 2026
Source notes: AllRanks assistant verified on 2026-10-22 against the linked official Census 2011 workbook, Sheet1. Read all 35 state/UT-level “Total” rows (excluded India aggregate, rural/urban subtotals, and district rows); matched the State/UT labels and source columns and re-sorted descending. Derived rates are calculated only from the workbook columns as described. The Census 2011 administrative boundaries are retained; later state/UT reorganizations are not retrofitted.
Coverage describes this list, not necessarily the full population. Missing entries do not imply a value of zero. Collection & methodology →