AllRanking
Loading ranking…
Loading ranking…
2011: Kerala ranks first at 1,084.0. 35 entries; unit: females per 1,000 males.
| Rank | Entry | Relative value | Value (females per 1,000 males) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Kerala | 1,084.0 | |
| 2 | Puducherry | 1,037.0 | |
| 3 | Tamil Nadu | 996.0 | |
| 4 | Andhra Pradesh | 993.0 | |
| 5 | Chhattisgarh | 991.0 | |
| 6 | Meghalaya | 989.0 | |
| 7 | Manipur | 985.0 | |
| 8 | Odisha | 979.0 | |
| 9 | Mizoram | 976.0 | |
| 10 | Goa | 973.0 | |
| 11 | Karnataka | 973.0 | |
| 12 | Himachal Pradesh | 972.0 | |
| 13 | Uttarakhand | 963.0 | |
| 14 | Tripura | 960.0 | |
| 15 | Assam | 958.0 | |
| 16 | West Bengal | 950.0 | |
| 17 | Jharkhand | 948.0 | |
| 18 | Lakshadweep | 946.0 | |
| 19 | Arunachal Pradesh | 938.0 | |
| 20 | Madhya Pradesh | 931.0 | |
| 21 | Nagaland | 931.0 | |
| 22 | Maharashtra | 929.0 | |
| 23 | Rajasthan | 928.0 | |
| 24 | Gujarat | 919.0 | |
| 25 | Bihar | 918.0 | |
| 26 | Uttar Pradesh | 912.0 | |
| 27 | Punjab | 895.0 | |
| 28 | Sikkim | 890.0 | |
| 29 | Jammu and Kashmir | 889.0 | |
| 30 | Haryana | 879.0 | |
| 31 | Andaman and Nicobar Islands | 876.0 | |
| 32 | NCT of Delhi | 868.0 | |
| 33 | Chandigarh | 818.0 | |
| 34 | Dadra and Nagar Haveli | 774.0 | |
| 35 | Daman and Diu | 618.0 |
Within India, Kerala ranks first in 2011 with 1,084.0, followed by Puducherry (1,037.0) and Tamil Nadu (996.0).
Across 35 entries, values run from 1,084.0 (Kerala) to 618.0 (Daman and Diu), with a median of 946.0.
Source: Office of the Registrar General & Census Commissioner, India — Primary Census Abstract (PCA), 2011, State/District level, 2011. Unit: females per 1,000 males.
Source: Office of the Registrar General & Census Commissioner, India — Primary Census Abstract (PCA), 2011, State/District level · Government of India Census data; public statistical use · manually compiled Oct 22, 2026
Source notes: AllRanks assistant verified on 2026-10-22 against the linked official Census 2011 workbook, Sheet1. Read all 35 state/UT-level “Total” rows (excluded India aggregate, rural/urban subtotals, and district rows); matched the State/UT labels and source columns and re-sorted descending. Derived rates are calculated only from the workbook columns as described. The Census 2011 administrative boundaries are retained; later state/UT reorganizations are not retrofitted.
Coverage describes this list, not necessarily the full population. Missing entries do not imply a value of zero. Collection & methodology →