Universities by Research Publications in Guinea

Universities and colleges ranked by the number of scholarly works indexed by OpenAlex. This measures research volume, not teaching quality. OpenAlex is an open scholarly index; larger and older institutions tend to have more indexed research.

📅 2026📏 works12 entries🇬🇳 See all of this country’s rankings →
Every dot is one entry, placed by its value (works, logarithmic scale); the vertical bar marks each row’s median.
1
Gamal Abdel Nasser University of Conakry47,319 citations
2,476
2
Institut Supérieur des Sciences et de Médecine Vétérinaire2,112 citations
259
3
Centre d’excellence africain pour la prévention et le contrôle des maladies transmissibles3,236 citations
173
4
Julius Nyerere University of Kankan1,498 citations
168
5
Institut Supérieur Agronomique et Vétérinaire Valéry Giscard d'Estaing2,878 citations
136
6
Université de Kindia284 citations
122
7
Université Général Lansana Conté713 citations
115
8
Institut Supérieur de Technologie de Mamou57 citations
55
9
Université Kofi Annan de Guinée233 citations
53
10
Institut Supérieur des Sciences de l'Éducation de Guinée44 citations
42
11
Centre Universitaire de Labé21 citations
33
12
Institut Supérieur de Formation à Distance7 citations
10

Highlights

Within Guinea, Gamal Abdel Nasser University of Conakry ranks first in 2026 with 2,476, followed by Institut Supérieur des Sciences et de Médecine Vétérinaire (259) and Centre d’excellence africain pour la prévention et le contrôle des maladies transmissibles (173).

Gamal Abdel Nasser University of Conakry is 9.6 times higher than Institut Supérieur des Sciences et de Médecine Vétérinaire, the runner-up.

Across 12 entries, values run from 2,476 (Gamal Abdel Nasser University of Conakry) to 10 (Institut Supérieur de Formation à Distance), with a median of 119.

Source: OpenAlex, institutional Publications, 2026. Unit: works.

Source: OpenAlex, institutional Publications · CC0 1.0 (OpenAlex) · fetched Oct 17, 2026 — OpenAlex indexes scholarly works and citations. Coverage and citation practices vary by institution and field; this is a research measure, not a ranking of teaching quality.