Ranking
Loading ranking…
Loading ranking…
2025: Thurrock ranks first at 136,863.92. 25 entries; unit: MWh.
| Rank | Entry | Relative value | Value (MWh) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ThurrockEastern | 136,863.92 | |
| 2 | BuckinghamshireSouth East | 113,308.27 | |
| 3 | HaveringLondon | 94,614.13 | |
| 4 | Central BedfordshireEastern | 85,526.04 | |
| 5 | WarringtonNorth West | 76,976.43 | |
| 6 | North LanarkshireScotland | 62,818.89 | |
| 7 | Vale of White HorseSouth East | 51,856.00 | |
| 8 | Glasgow CityScotland | 50,104.51 | |
| 9 | North LincolnshireYorkshire and Humber | 49,685.00 | |
| 10 | SomersetSouth West | 42,238.99 | |
| 11 | ColchesterEastern | 41,531.36 | |
| 12 | LeedsYorkshire and Humber | 38,963.50 | |
| 13 | North NorthamptonshireEast Midlands | 38,443.00 | |
| 14 | WiltshireSouth West | 35,921.74 | |
| 15 | Cannock ChaseWest Midlands | 35,094.07 | |
| 16 | DoncasterYorkshire and Humber | 31,504.35 | |
| 17 | GatesheadNorth East | 27,182.65 | |
| 18 | South CambridgeshireEastern | 26,251.08 | |
| 19 | New ForestSouth East | 25,222.43 | |
| 20 | PeterboroughEastern | 24,814.87 | |
| 21 | CornwallSouth West | 24,521.46 | |
| 22 | Cheshire West And ChesterNorth West | 24,301.29 | |
| 23 | NorthumberlandNorth East | 23,786.64 | |
| 24 | Cheshire EastNorth West | 23,127.77 | |
| 25 | AberdeenshireScotland | 22,232.13 |
Within United Kingdom, Thurrock ranks first in 2025 with 136,863.92, followed by Buckinghamshire (113,308.27) and Havering (94,614.13).
Across 25 entries, values run from 136,863.92 (Thurrock) to 22,232.13 (Aberdeenshire), with a median of 38,443.00.
Source: Department for Energy Security and Net Zero, Renewable electricity by local authority, 2014 to 2025, 2025. Unit: MWh.
Source: Department for Energy Security and Net Zero, Renewable electricity by local authority, 2014 to 2025 · Open Government Licence v3.0 · manually compiled Oct 22, 2026
Source notes: AllRanks assistant verified on 2026-10-22 against the Department for Energy Security and Net Zero original workbook “Renewable electricity by local authority, 2014 to 2025”, worksheets “LA - Generation, 2025” and “LA - Capacity, 2025”. Checked all included local authority names, metric columns, values, units and descending order. Rows for regional/national aggregates were excluded. Values marked [X] by the publisher are suppressed and omitted; only positive, numeric local-authority observations are listed, so rankings may omit areas with suppressed values. This is a source-data check, not independent measurement.
Coverage describes this list, not necessarily the full population. Missing entries do not imply a value of zero. Collection & methodology →